<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting to the point with PowerPoint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefullblog.com/2007/12/11/getting-to-the-point-with-powerpoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefullblog.com/2007/12/11/getting-to-the-point-with-powerpoint/</link>
	<description>Phil Darby of The Full Effect Company sounds off about marketing &#34;stuff&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://thefullblog.com/2007/12/11/getting-to-the-point-with-powerpoint/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vincent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefullblog.wordpress.com/2007/12/11/getting-to-the-point-with-powerpoint/#comment-45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phew; you  don&#039;t beat about the bush. Thank F*** if you&#039;ll pardon my censored profanity. I work with powerpoint presentations daily and have never felt quite sane when I deliver them to clients as if they ought to represent an entire marketing study, albeit in point form... I&#039;m frustrated by the process, frustrated by the fact that it is what I consider the shiny wrapper covering the real prize..the information. I feel that one&#039;s thoughts if documented properly, as you put it, in document form, ought to act as the cerebral back bone for your power point presentation and not as is generally the case the entire thought process / product or body of research.. 

Is there any remedy for this situation, our clientèle now assume power point presentations are the norm and expect them.. What do you suggest we do, as we cannot produce both documents due to time constraints.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phew; you  don&#8217;t beat about the bush. Thank F*** if you&#8217;ll pardon my censored profanity. I work with powerpoint presentations daily and have never felt quite sane when I deliver them to clients as if they ought to represent an entire marketing study, albeit in point form&#8230; I&#8217;m frustrated by the process, frustrated by the fact that it is what I consider the shiny wrapper covering the real prize..the information. I feel that one&#8217;s thoughts if documented properly, as you put it, in document form, ought to act as the cerebral back bone for your power point presentation and not as is generally the case the entire thought process / product or body of research.. </p>
<p>Is there any remedy for this situation, our clientèle now assume power point presentations are the norm and expect them.. What do you suggest we do, as we cannot produce both documents due to time constraints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

