The Full Blog

Entries categorized as ‘innovation’

Creating an Ideas Organisation

Thursday 18 September 2008 · No Comments

I have an absolutely unshakable belief in the “ideas organisation”, which is why I get so pissed off by organisations that only want to perpetuate a winning formula.  They just don’t get it, do they?  The facts are indesputable, a winning formula is only winning when its new and original, once its old-hat or plagarised the value dissappears FAST and that’s getting to mean a realy short shelf life for most businesses.  As I have said many times before - “Your organisation is only as good as your NEXT big idea”.  Move on!

Of course, when your organisation is structured and geared to perpetuating the routine, its not easy to climb out of the rut.  This is noticeable at every level of an offending organisation.  In my Brand Discovery workshops I always start with an exercise designed to help delegates break the mold.  A quick and simple demonstration of how it feels to think normally.  Yes, normally, because normal thinking is what drives creativity.  The problem that we have is that we mistakenly belive that the way we think every day is normal.  Well, wake up and smell the coffee, you aren’t normal, you are conditioned!

Jennifer Goddard reports on BNET this week on Mr Mindmapping, Tony Buzan’s conference that she attended in Singapore, where he spoke of an experiment in Utah that pitted under-fives against graduates in a creativity test.  I think it is a rather old and well-known piece of research that he refers to, where the under-fives won 95% to 10%, thus proving, or so it would seem, that we start creative and have it beaten (read educated) out of us.  In one of my favourite presentations on TED, Ken Robinson promotes just this thought.

So with all this stuff working against you, how are you going to create your ideas organisation?  The way I see it, its not about workshops and brainstorming, useful though they may be once you are an ideas organisation.  Sadly, I usually find these things are more “last chance saloon” than “brave new world” and tend to find their way onto the agenda about the time an organisation realises it doesn’t have a hope. 

Great buinesses have idea generation in their DNA, or rather “idea liberation”, because the ideas are always there, hiding away in the corners of the minds of your employees, the task is to set them free.  How do you do this?  Well firstly you have to give them, value.  

We all have ideas, all the time.  Small ones, big ones, funny ones, evil ones, even profitable ones.  The reason that they don’t ever see the light of day is because we are embarassed to express them!  Why embarrassed?  Well, I guess that’s one of the mysteries of social conditioning, but basically most ideas are pants and we just can’t live with that.  We’re so insecure that we can’t bear the thought of people knowing that we had a stupid idea.  How how stupid an idea is that?

We have to learn the value of mistakes.  I’m sure Michaeangelo didn’t just turn up and knock off the Sistine chapel first attempt.  He must have had a warm up, a trial run, scrapped a few attempts even,  Shit, nobody’s that good!  So get real.  And the reality is that there are loads of crap ideas, but every now and then there is a really great one and it isn’t always obvious at first encounter which is which, so you have to give them all an airing.

So, if you want to be an Ideas Organisation, and, frankly, these days no organisation can afford not to be, the first step is to value ideas,  Sounds obvious, but take a look around you, it doesn’t happen.  We still value only the good ones and snigger at the people who come up with the runts.   We forget that, good or bad, all ideas are worth something because without the hopeless ones you won’t ever discover the great ones.  How do you gt to this, well, hey, I get paid for this, so If you want the “how”, hire me!

Once you have achived this though, step two involves creating the conduit through which the ideas are funnelled into the system.  What system?  The one you create in step three that’s what system.  Too fast for you?  OK, here’s it is again,

  • Step one - value ideas.  Convince yourself that ideas are always good and some are great.
  • Step two - build a communications conduit.  Two-way so that you can persuade your stakeholders that you value ideas, then they will too and as a result they’ll bring them to you.
  • Step three - develop a way of presenting the ideas.  Its important to help people express their ideas in the nearest to business terms they can get, and anyway, its a good business discipline training exercise for them.
  • Step four - Create a test process.  All you need do here is decide how these ideas are going to be explored, the stages that you will go though to minimise risk (Yes, of course there’s risk, the smart guys minimise it though)
  • Step five - establish criteria for judgement. You need to be able to tell as early as possible in your exploration whether an idea will fly, so you need a set of criteria.  You might choose generic ones that support only your Brand Model, or you might design a different set for each idea or every stage in theexploration process.  
  • Step six - Implement.  Its amazing how many great ideas get put on hold, until the time is right.  The time is NOW!  And, if you are facing difficult times such as we all are now, the time was yesterday, so you’ll have to move fast to catch up!  Every time there is recession in any part of the world the guys who push ahead with idea development end up being the winners.  Check the facts.

Now you’re “cooking on gas”.  You are an ideas organisation!  You’re not?  Didn’t like it then eh?  Oh well, it was just an idea!

Categories: Full Effect · Full Efffect Marketing · The Full Effect Company · Training · ideas · innovation · internal marketing · management · marketing · phil darby · strategy · the big idea · workshops

The new challenge for marketers in Central Europe

Friday 29 August 2008 · No Comments

Things tend to run to a pattern.  When Middle East markets started to develop I witnessed how the initial surge of ex-pat managers was replaced wholesale by cheaper local workers just as soon as their bosses felt they could handle things.  Things started to slide shortly afterwards giving rise to the scramble to reinstate many of the key ex-pat managers before the appropriate balance of local/ex-pat managers was finally established.  Not for the first time the adage “there’s no substitute for experience” was given credence.  But, history repeats itself and I’m now watching the same pattern unravel in Central Europe.

Nobody would fail to understand the pride that drives people in emerging markets to take control of their own businesses as soon as they feel able.  However, there’s often an element of naivety associated with this process and that has definitely been the case in some of the Central European nations who have chased off their “expensive” ex-pat managers, or large corporates who have reassigned their senior foreign managers, to other parts of the world.  Nobody would deny the progress that these nations have all made from their Communist roots to the realities of commercialism, but maybe one important reality has been missed.

The fact is that the growth and development that Central Europe has experienced, has, so far, been against a backdrop of a strong European/world economy.  Such was the local competition that for many businesses, success in these markets has been a case of nothing more than turning up and opening your doors for business, but its all change as small consumer bases are spoilt for choice, investors look to other regions of the world for bigger and quicker returns on their investment and the state of the world economy has called time on the gravy train.  Now its game on, real business and the question is “are local managers up to the challenge?”

It seems that the local managers in the CE offices of global giants are better-trained and therefore better equipped than those of smaller, albeit still often multi-national, concerns (although I know of one global where the levels of competence demonstrated by local managers is truly appalling).  However, as the economy shifts and the challenges it represents change, businesses here are definitely sliding further and faster than you would expect in the West and already a couple of businesses that I know of are busy enticing back the ex-pat managers they waved goodbye to not too long ago.  You just can’t make up for fifty years of isolation, in a period when technological and commercial advances were faster and more substantial than ever before, with fifteen years of training in a cushy market, however intensive that training may be.  When the chips are down you need your best men and women and it looks like the best here are reaching the limit of their capability.

A few years ago my then teenage son spent his summer in Prague working as an intern in an advertising agency.  He was assigned to an account team among graduates who were all a good few years older than he was.  Within a couple of weeks he naturally assumed control of a major presentation, which was highly successful, giving rise to a comment by the agency MD that my son was a genius.  Much as fatherly pride might allow me to acknowledge this observation, in reality I have to point out that the truth is that, in this context at least, he wasn’t anything special.  However, having been brought up in a commercial environment he had learned by osmosis and his responses to decision-making situations and his understanding of basic commerce meant that many choices that his temporary colleagues were able to make only as a result of training, he made instinctively and therefore far quicker and appropriately.  These days there isn’t quite such a gulf between the decision-making capability of westerners and locals, but there’s no doubt that local managers are often less confident than you would expect their counterparts in Western markets to be.  Furthermore, where there is confidence it is still frequently and dangerously miss-placed.

To be fair I also have to acknowledge that a notable number of ex-pats who didn’t have the skills and experience to succeed in business in the West have, in the absence of any serious local competition, managed to create quite substantial businesses in these countries.  Such businesses are not excluded from the laws of business gravity though, and many now show signs of having reached the limit of their competence.  It seems that the limitations of their founders and the usual and consequential lack of a capable senior and mid-level management structure have conspired to leave many of these organisations vulnerable too.

So where are we going with this?  The so far gravity-defying Czech economy, despite vastly inflated property prices and increasing supermarket bills, appears on the surface to be healthier than most of its European neighbours, but if things start to slide it would seem that it will take the best that the best managers can offer to avoid some serious retrenchment.  Whether local managers (indigenous or ex-pat) are up to the challenge is yet to be seen, but so far the signs are not good and my guess is that the skills of those who are good enough wll be stretched far too thin.

There are a healthy number of SMEs in the Czech Market for example, but when you study them closely they are largely one-man-and-a-dog operations that are going nowhere, even in the favourable conditions that have prevailed so far.  Czechs are largely not commercially ambitious and most of those who are, set their sights on the trappings of success rather than the performance standards and quality of execution that will bring them.  My guess is that the commercial landscape of countries like this will change dramatically in the near future.  A purge of dead wood maybe and a wake-up for the complacent who think that they had “made it”.  Its all grist to the mill of commerce, but I am sure that some of the people that I see on a daily basis in Central Europe will be shocked to say the least, to see substantial organisations that they had assumed, because of their scale, were bullet-proof, disappearing from the business map.  The writing is on the wall for some already.

I am sure the tourism sector will be among the first to face the challenge.  Until now places like Prague have represented good value for travellers from the West, but this is no longer the case.  Strength of the Czech Korun combined with the high margins that typically inefficient businesses require, mean that prices for most things are (at least) equal to those in the UK.  Branded goods are usually more expensive and quality of domestic products and service remain well below the West.  Service is a particular issue.  With hard-pressed Westerners forced to be picky about where they spend their holiday money, it may be that the summer surge of tourists on which economies like Prague’s depend will be reduced to a trickle.  There’s a counter to this of course, because while the traditional Western tourists to Prague may turn away, everyone in the West will be sliding down the holiday scale a little and it may be that travellers who had previously gone to more exotic resorts or cities will discover the alternative that is Central Europe.  Somehow, though, I don’t think so.  Word travels fast, especially in the holiday sector.

I’m not predicting a dramatic collapse by any means, but I would be very surprised if we weren’t going to witness a watershed in the commercial development of some of these Central European countries.

Categories: Brand Discovery · Full Effect · Full Efffect Marketing · Government · The Full Effect Company · brand development · business development · business strategy · central europe · communications · communist · customer · customers · decision · decision-making · developed markets · efficiency · indecision · innovation · management · marketing · opportunity · phil darby

Are we losing sight of strategy?

Thursday 28 August 2008 · No Comments

I was sifting through my spam filter earlier, trying to decide where to buy the Viagra that will “make her smile tonight” and provide an outing for the “massive tool” that I am assured can be mine without surgery, when I came across a mail from an old colleague that had been misdirected there.

I was delighted to hear from him after a lengthy silence, but his message was sad.  Basically, the gist is that he has come to the conclusion that despite their constant talk, organisations really don’t want strategy anymore.  In fact, he suggested that if you corner many senior managers in the pub they’ll tell you that in their opinion, strategy just gets in the way of real day-to-day business.  As a consequence my old colleague is now resigned to a daily routine of moving the usual tactical shit back and forth between an ever-decreasing number of parking places.

These days we are all pretty well agreed that the fundamental difference between a successful oragnisation and an unsuccessful one is efficiency.  The thing is that in an effort to increase their efficiency many organisations have thrown the baby out with the bathwater - reducing head-count without establishing a stragic framework or methodology.  For those of us who have undertaken house renovations on any scale this is akin to setting up your Acrow props to keep the ceiling in place, knocking down the supporting wall and then removing the props without first installing the RSJ.  The result is that your days thereafter will be spent addressing the purely tactical issue of preventing parts of your bedroom from moving into your lounge.  Most organisation will find that it is possible for them to reduce their marketing head-count, but only if there is a strategic framework in which the tactical day-to-day can operate.  If not, the tactical will take over and demand ever increasing time and resource.

If, like me, you studied such things when notes were taken with a pen and paper (if not a slate!) you’ll be familiar with the debate over the relationship between transactional and transformational management.  Having decided that the traditional cycle, which alternated between a transactional and transformational business model, produced business modulations with a less that acceptable aggregate performance, we concluded that a business model that included both elements operating simultaneously was the way to go.  The idea was, and is, that the transformational guys (or strategists) focus on devising new products, services, and marketing ideas, which they then hand over to transactors to perpetuate.  Any organisation is only as good as its next big idea and this is the only way an organisation can generate essential innovation whilst still managing the day-to-day.

Without the appropriate strategic support an organisation is driven ever further into the mire of purely tactical marketing.  Its a mire because a purely tactical approach is slow.  You get left behind.  To keep up you have to continually throw in more resource, which is self-defeating, or add pressure to your personnel, which in turn inevitably leads to dissatisfaction, resignations, lack of continuity, skills gaps and, of course, poor performance on every level.

Going back to the “efficiency” thing, successful organisations are those that reach the market objective first.  Imagine two people, one blindfolded, standing at the end of a corridor littered with largish obstacles.  Now, visualise what would happen if you told them both to get to the opposite end of the corridor as quickly as possible.  The result would be a pretty accurate illustration of the difference between an organisation with a strategy and one without - strategy is your long vision.  You can bumble around without it for a while, but you’ll never win against a competitor with a their tactical and strategic (or transactional and transformational) elements working together.  Strategy is what helps you use your resources more efficiently.  It is not a luxury that you can cut back on when cash is short, but the means to make that cash go further.

We are all familiar with the facts that show that organisations that maintain or even increase their marketing efforts through a recession end up on top when the recession lifts, but I wonder if this result is as much a product of the organisations concerned, stopping and thinking about their business in order to make the bold decision to buck the trend, as it is the investment itself.  If you look at the winners in this scenario they tend to be enlightened businesses with a firm grasp of the real issues and a sound strategic habit.

Despite all the lessons of the past, it remains a common recessionary practice to cut back on strategy and focus on the short-term when times get tough.  Now I think about it, I have probably encountered an increasing number of businesses in recent months that appear to be retrenching into the tactical.  I even had the CEO of a major listed company tell me the other day that he was too busy with day-to-day business to find the time to work on strategy, but is my old colleague right?  Are businesses really abandoning the long-vision in favour of the tactical treadmill, or is this just a predictable recessionary blip?  I can’t really believe that the former is so, but what do you think?

Now, where is that Viagra supplier …?

Categories: Brand Discovery · Brand Model · Full Effect · Full Efffect Marketing · brand · brand development · brands · business development · business strategy · efficiency · innovation · management · marketing · promise

How big is a “big idea”?

Friday 29 February 2008 · 1 Comment

dreamstime_1859101.jpgI talk a lot about “the big idea” to clients and the delegates to my seminars, in fact anybody who will listen. The fashion in marketing these days seems to be to focus on the delivery of the message rather more than the message itself and while I think its right that we should all be striving to make delivery more efficient, the danger is that some of us are ignoring an equally important issue. You might have the best delivery system in the business, but if you don’t have anything worth saying you may as well not bother!

Maybe it harks back to my creative roots, but I am passionate about “the big idea”. Its a principle that applies equally to all areas of business not just marketing communications, but I can’t help having that “Yes!” reaction when I see some of the great creative solutions that have come from marketing services firms like Lowe and Droga5 (some of their recent stuff blows me away).

I was talking to the VP Marketing of a global telco a couple of weeks ago and he was expressing his frustration at not being able to find a marketing services firm that genuinely embraced the “big idea”. The point he was making was that if he briefed an advertising agency they would come back with a response that worked on TV and maybe some other media, but didn’t really have legs in the context of the far greater communications arena that we acknowledge today. The same applied if he briefed a promotions company or an experiential agency. He felt that nobody was capable of separating the “idea” from the media - nothing changes then!

There’s another aspect to this that was brought home to me recently in a dialogue I was having on another blog. The subject there was “trade shows” and most contributors were commenting that as new methods of measurement were becoming available and practical they were revealing that trade shows weren’t viable. My angle on this was that, as with any other communications route, the bar has been raised considerably and like TV, and press there was no point investing in a trade show unless you had a “big dea” that would cut through and get you noticed. One contributor responded with the statement that he had found that even with a “big idea” he was struggling and he posted photos of a recent trade show exhibit. Once I saw these I realise that it isn’t about acceptance of the need for a big idea, but having the discernment to recognise how big a “big idea” had to be. His example was positively pants! Definitely grounds for firing his agency.

There’s a parallel here with the delegates to my Brand Discovery workshops, who when it comes to the point where they have to nominate their “point of difference” always come up with stuff that is mundane and very ordinary. Of course, that’s why we marketing folks are here, but I think that even in our world genuine creativity is rare. I see far too many so-so agencies who think they have cracked it - its self delusional.

Going back to Droga5, In response to a brief to tackle in-school use of mobile phones that was disrupting lessons, they did a deal with Motorola and gave away a million mobile phones to students in New York schools as the focal point of their “Million” project (take a look at their case study here). These phones were on a discrete network that delivered only educational content during school hours, but reverted to a normal phone network outside of those hours. Students earned credits to spend on phone calls and other stuff by accessing the educational content. The cost of the exercise was covered in full by advertising, which means that anybody could have done this … if they had the imagination. Now that’s a big idea!

Categories: The Full Effect Company · Trade shows · advertising · below-the-line · brand · brands · consulting · ideas · innovation · marketing · media · phil darby · strategy · the big idea

So, what makes you so different?

Friday 29 February 2008 · No Comments

mark_wing-davey_as_zaphod_beeblebrox.jpg

Strong personalities appeal to me and I don’t think I’m alone in that. In fact I was reading research last week that suggested that most of us find people with strong characters more attractive than people who were just “nice”. Of course, it’s great, if you can be both - “nice” and “interesting” - but if its an either/or give me “interesting” every time. It adds up to some difficult relationships, but hey! … it makes life colourful and most importantly for us marketers - its engaging!.

This factor influences us in more ways than we might at first appreciate. For instance, it influences the brands that we buy. Think about it. Its how Apple (full of character) scored over Big Blue (full of … boringness?) or how Mark Ecko, the T-shirt guy made his rhinoceros the thing to have on your chest or back pocket (who saw that Air Force One stunt? - Wild!). Talking of aircraft, I don’t know anybody who would consider Ryan Air’s Michael O’Leary to be Mr Nice Guy, but he has become one of those people you love to hate and his airline is a runaway success. Conversely, you don’t see any cool people wearing T-shirts with “Boots the chemist” printed on them because Boots are boring!

This is not some kind of new radical thinking of course. Adam Morgan explained how it works in his book Eating The Big Fish(still one of my favourites) way back in 1998. Its “lighthouse branding” and its the basis of challenger brand marketing. If you are a market leader you might think you can afford to be boring (that’s why so many market leaders are) and of course, once you are there, in the top slot its easy to fall into the trap of believing you don’t have to put yourself out too much thinking of new stuff to make yourself interesting, but while you are kicking back, give a thought to some of the big organisations who had their business snuck away from them while they were resting on their laurels. I can think of a few who are heading that way now.

I’m no advocate of superficial branding, but it’s certainly true that if you want to be successful you have to be the best at what you do and if you can’t be the best being different will certainly buy you the first rung on the ladder. One of the nine elements (the nine P’s) in the brand models we create in my Brand Discovery workshops defines the brand’s “Point of difference”. It still surprises me how few of the delegates to my workshops really appreciate what “different” really means. Rarely is anybody extreme enough at the first pass around the table and its clear that most organisations delude themselves by believing that their very ordinary traits make them distinctive. I usually find that the best way to identify a potential point of difference is to ask customers. For instance, some years ago I worked on this with a mobile phone company whose subscribers told us that they were sick of the complicated tariffs that mobile operators offered. They felt that they were making them confusing on purpose to disguise high costs. We replied with a real point of difference - one tariff for all, wrapped up in a “champions of the people” brand character, and it worked.

Most places that you see a real success story you will find a distinctive brand character - Starbucks, Harley Davidson, Virgin - and they’ll almost always be a response to a consumer need. Modern media makes it simple to gather consumer feedback at pretty much every point of contact so there’s no excuse for not knowing what your customers want, think or believe is interesting and as I always say - every communication in any communication strategy should be two-way. I find there are people who don’t think that’s possible, but you can usually get feedback if you really want it with a little applied ingenuity.

Of course, you still have to deliver your promise and in part that’s about maintaining your point of difference, but that’s the another chapter in my Full Effect Marketing story.

Categories: Full Effect · Full Efffect Marketing · The Full Effect Company · advertising · brand · brands · consulting · ideas · innovation · marketing · phil darby · promise

Thought I was kidding? Genome scanning for health and relationships already a commercial reality.

Thursday 31 January 2008 · No Comments

doctor.jpgSo, who thought I was kidding when I suggested last month that we’d soon be judged by our genes?  Well, I have news for you guys - its already happening!

The obvious initial application for genome scanning I guess would always be for health reasons and sure enough there are now at least four commercial set-ups ready to scan and analyse your genes to tell you what nasty diseases you are likely to suffer from in the future (that’s assuming that you haven’t already).

The aptly named decodeme.com offers to scan you for eighteen known diseases at a special introductory price of $985!  There are even discounts for bulk purchases - no you don’t need more than one scan, but you could bring the family along - strange, I thought the point of all this was that these diseases were inherited, so the results would all be the same!

On their user-friendly web site the Decodeme folks point out that they will not only tell you what you are going to die of (my words), but where your ancestors came from.  Hmph, do I really want to know this?

Knome.com adopt a more clinical style with their limited offer to twenty people who they say for $350,000 (A bit more up-market than decodeme.com then) can help “pioneer an emerging science” and give the Knome people a nice retirement.  (I added that last bit!).  They are quite open about their motives.  “We are a for-profit, privately held genomics company …” You ain’t kiddin’!

The catchily-named 32andme.com ask “Do you have your Mother’s sense of taste” - shit, I hope not!  Now that might give me the incentive to sign up for this thing.  At least I could top myself at the first sign of floral patterns in my wardrobe!  The great thing about this is that its mail-order - yup, you heard me!  No pretence here about white coats and science, this is straight-from-the-hip, sure-fire genetics for the masses - and for only $999!

The fourth that I came across was Navigenics.com whose “Navigenics Health Compass” comes in at a mainstream 2,500 bucks and you get your own website thrown in(?)  Hey, don’t ask me ask them!

Most of these organisations say that while they will scan you for the conditions that are recognisable with today’s knowledge, they will also update you as new discoveries come along.  Sort of puts a whole new slant on the old joke about the guy at the doctors who asks “OK doc so tell me how long have I got?” and the doctor says something like “don’t buy any long-playing records” (That’s a joke for those of us who remember vinyl).  I can see it now …

You are sitting in a meeting and you get an SMS that says “u hve 3 mins 2 get 2 hosptl.  Jst dscvrd u r going 2 die of …”.

Thankfully Specificmatch.com have put this science to really worthwhile use with a genetic dating service.  Yes, now you can be genetically compatible.  All your troubles are over - no more marital tiffs or divorces.  Of course when a “new discovery” prompts a change in diagnosis the SMS is a bit different - “sry marid rong wmn!”  I wonder if you could make them liable for the alimony?

Categories: Full Effect · Full Efffect Marketing · The Full Effect Company · consulting · gene · genetic · genome · innovation · marketing · phil darby · scanning · strategy

Brands and architecture

Tuesday 22 January 2008 · No Comments

The Dancing Building. PragueI’ve been working with architects and planners for the past few weeks and fascinating it has been too.  I have been trying to identify the key component of the perfect urban development, which sounds simple enough, until you try to find hard facts to support ideas and theories.  Then you quickly discover that once the buildings are up and the developers have made their money nobody is too bothered to find out if the development actually worked.

There was one worthwhile project that I uncovered though.  Its called the SHE Project - SHE being the abbreviation of Sustainable Housing in Europe.  So far it is the only project I have found that actually sets out to measure the benefits of various aspects of housing design.  Its just a pity there are no results yet (although the Italian government has changed it’s policy in response to the short-term results achieved by the SHE developments that are taking place in their country, so I guess the general indications are good).  I just wish that someone had done something similar for other aspects of planning and development - like a study of the optimal socio-economic mix for a new town, or the influence that integrating less well off and disadvantaged social groups with more affluent residents has on crime and social dissatisfaction!

I met some interesting characters on this project too.  Like an apparently well thought-of world authority on the subject who just seems to swear and rant a lot, but doesn’t appear actually contribute much and a developer in Eastern Europe who seems to be able to raise limitless funds (I’m talking hundreds of millions of Euros here!) for a development before he has a plan!  No, don’t ask!

Anyway, all this brought me around to the idea of Cities as brands again.  I say again because its something that I talk about often in my Brand Discovery Programme workshops and Full Effect Marketing seminars.  The particular prompt on this occasion came as I was reading through some stuff on the shenanigans surrounding a planned new development in Adelaide.  Don’t you just love Aussie politics?  It must be one of the few Western-style democracies where politics reach such a height of verbal and sometimes physical abuse that the real issues become secondary.

Anyway, I picked up on a debate about whether the design of the new centre was, or even should be, in keeping with the Victorian and mock Gothic architecture that the State Capital is known for.  Somebody had commented that the centre should be Victorian in style because that was what Adelaide is all about.  Now we’re talking branding and that’s my subject.

On one hand maybe the brand Adelaide is about faux Victorian architecture, in which case the Victorian style shopping centre would be right on.  However, if the existing mock Victorian architecture was in its day more about being off-the-wall architecturally, that’s a different promise altogether.

Living part the time as I do in Prague I have seen how a city renown for startling architecture across the centuries maintains this reputation today (despite a short interruption by the Commies).  Prague made the decision very quickly after the fall of Communism that its new buildings would match the promise of the First Republic and before - not reproductions of a classical style mind you, but bold contemporary statements as the old buildings certainly were in their time.  The city fathers started small this time, with a building on the river, known to everyone now as the “dancing building” and over the last twenty years they have expanded their vision and encouraged architects and planners from around the word to bring their wild ideas to the city, resulting in larger stunning projects that contrast with the old, but reflect the same bold architectural statement of their forefathers - its starting to work!

I have lost count of the number of brands I have come across that have failed to recognise that it was the fact they were different rather than what made them so, that created their success in the first place and this is the same thing.  Prague could have gone the way of many British town planners and created reproduction architecture that looked like reproduction antique furniture - and we all know how tasteful that can be - NOT!  Its a lesson a lot of brand’s could use.  Instead of setting up their business to deliver the promise - a constant flow of new and different concepts - too many organisations have invested all their effort in trying to perpetuate an old idea.  What happens every time is their least imaginative competitors catch up, do the same thing and between them they turn the sector into … well, Slough (and we all know what John Betjeman made of that) until the next lighthouse brand comes along and whips their boring butts!

Successful brands (I mean brands that hang around for a few years) continually re-invent themselves coming up with new ideas and trading concepts that match the evolution of consumers - you are only as good as your next good idea!  Of course, nobody would deny, there’s always a chance that you’ll get it wrong, but even if you did, the worst consequence isn’t going to be as bad as the ultimate oblivion that lies in store for those who are stuck in a rut.  Besides, you can always change again and try to get it right - so you might as well just get on with it.

My foray into the world of architecture also gave me another parallel and that too resonates with the countries of Central and Eastern Europe.  It goes back to the establishment of Christianinity in the West and the way that Christian churches were built on pagan religeous sites.  The idea was to symbolise the authority of the new religion.  When the Communists were in charge further East they did the same thing. Ceausescu in Romania was a master.  He virtually wiped out all evidence of history in Bucharest, replacing classical buildings with massive concrete blocks and cheap pre-fabricated high rises, but he also created a palace that was the third biggest building on earth.  Like a King rising above his subjects this dominates a grid of other Communist buildings from its raised position.  When you see it you just know what it stood for - no doubt there!  Although Prague wasn’t vandalised by the Communists like some other cities, its present day story is one of the brand reaserting its promise - pulling down the panelaks and replacing them with contemporary manifestations of the promise it always made.  There are a few commercial brands that could do with the same treatment.

Sure its tough to keep comming up with ideas, but that’s what marketing is, for Christ’s sake!  Its also why we marketers get paid (so they tell me!) so well!

Categories: Full Effect · Full Efffect Marketing · The Full Effect Company · architecture · brand · ceausescu · central europe · communist · czech · dancing building · design · ideas · innovation · marketing · pagan · phil darby · strategy · sustainable housing · tradition · urban development

The future of the Automotive industry?

Saturday 12 January 2008 · 3 Comments

chevvy.jpg

In his Video blog this week Al Ries tosses us the thought that Automotive giants like Ford and Chevrolet might, in future, cut their wide model ranges down opting instead for a single model that they can focus their efforts on.  Unlikely, I think, but its clear that something has to change in the Auto world.

The reason that I think Al is wrong is really because the Automotive industry is full of emotion - emotional consumer buying decisions of course but emotional business decisions too.  Somehow I can’t see the guys at GM, Chevy or Ford accepting that they have been heading in the wrong direction for the last fifty years and winding down to a corner shop operation, whatever the commercials might say.  But that’s just my gut feel.

Ben Bacon suggests in a comment that Mini is a example of this in action, which it isn’t really, but I get his point.  The Mini idea though might suggest a pattern for the future.

There are a lot of issues to consider here, but just to take a few key ones - Environment, fuel consumption, cost of product development and staying in the game and decreasing car ownership (I think so).  One solution to this might be that the globals sell off brands or even some models like Stingray and Mustang that are really brands in their own right just like Mini, to marketing organisations, but offer a manufacturing resource to the new owners.  Design can be sub-contracted out by the new owners to specialists (It seems often to be anyway) and so even might distribution and other stuff.

What you get as a result is a kind of Mini scenario, with global distribution that avoids the environmental cost of shipping vehicles, or even parts, around the world.  The brand owners can choose what markets they go for and manufacture locally and develop models that they feel meet the demands of their segment.

OK, so that’s the Automotive industry sorted, what’s next?

Categories: Al Ries · American · Chevrolet · Ford · Full Effect · Full Efffect Marketing · Mini · The Full Effect Company · automotive · brand · brands · innovation · management · marketing · phil darby

Expanding the “Genetic Marketing” idea

Thursday 3 January 2008 · 2 Comments

For those of you who might be interested in the concept I floated in my post last month ”So it looks like marketing might be science after all” you can download a short summary of my thoughts on this subject here.  Feel free to come back and add your own thoughts and comments or join the discussion on LinkedIn.com. under “Genetic Marketing”.

Categories: CRM · Full Effect · Full Efffect Marketing · The Full Effect Company · consulting · data · data analysis · efficiency · gene · genetic · ideas · innovation · marketing · phil darby · recruitment · strategy

Michael Crichton a brand that succeeds for all the right reasons

Tuesday 1 January 2008 · No Comments

11-crichton-450.jpg

Brands are everywhere and take many forms, but it takes a while for delegates to my Brand Discovery workshops to get around to adding authors to the lists we create - however authors definitely are brands and Michael Crichton is one of the biggest.  From Jurassic Park to his latest novel ”Next” every new arrival from Michael demonstrates what it takes to create a successful brand.

I’m not sure if he, or his publishers have even done anything like my Brand Discovery programme to produce the definitive Michael Crichton Brand Model, but if they had, my money would be on them having identified his “promise” as being something like “making every page-turn an introduction to new thoughts and ideas”.  For sure a Crichton novel is guaranteed not only to heighten your awareness of what’s going on behind those closed doors, but it will draw your attention to new doors that you didn’t even know were there and set you thinking about where all the “going on” is taking us.  Usually, as in the case of Next, its somewhere few would volunteer to venture.

I have always wondered when reading Michael’s books, at the incredible detail and insider knowledge that could only be the result of an inordinate amount of research and even given that he has PhD from Harvard Medical School “Next”, which is staged in the world of genetic research and medicine, books_next.jpgmust have represented no less of a piece of work.

From the questions that are posed to me as I work around the world I get the impression that there are people who believe that once they have a good idea and a marketing strategy, success is guaranteed, but, of course, its never that simple and whatever field you are in there will rarely be an alternative to hard graft.  Hard work can make an average idea float and turn a decent idea into something truly worthwhile. 

In business development workshops I often ask delegates what is an acceptable level of success in delivering your promise and people usually answer with percentages that are well below 100%, which still amazes me.  The thing is that the best laid plans can and do go wrong and aiming for 100% usually results in a delivery of far less than that.  The fact is that if you want to succeed you have to deliver100% and that means aiming well above that.  Michael Crichton, despite his success and the fact that, at least from the perspective of most of us, is unlikely to need ever to work again, clearly understands this.

Great ideas that challenge convention, incredibly highly researched and worked at with a work ethic akin to a coal-face worker, this is a profile of a great brand and the reason why Michael Crichton is way up there on my list of the World’s Great Brands.  What are yours and why? 

Categories: Full Effect · Full Efffect Marketing · The Full Effect Company · brand · brands · consulting · gene · genetic · ideas · innovation · marketing · michael crichton · strategy